<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sudarpo Chang with .NET &#187; Rants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sudarpo.net/category/visual-studio-2010/rants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sudarpo.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:32:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Official or Offical Site of Visual Studio 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.sudarpo.net/2010/04/official-or-offical-vs-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sudarpo.net/2010/04/official-or-offical-vs-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 07:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sudarpo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[april-2010-launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offical site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[official site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Studio 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sudarpo.net/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today 12 April 2010, is another big day for Microsoft. It&#8217;s official launch date of Visual Studio 2010. Curiously I went to its official site. I was surprised to see the site title wrote &#8220;Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 &#8211; The Offical Site of Visual Studio 2010&#8243;. Come on, Microsoft! You&#8217;ve got to do better than <a href='http://www.sudarpo.net/2010/04/official-or-offical-vs-2010/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today 12 April 2010, is another big day for Microsoft. It&#8217;s official launch date of Visual Studio 2010. Curiously I went to its <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/en-us/">official site</a>. I was surprised to see the site title wrote &#8220;Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 &#8211; The <strong>Offical</strong> Site of Visual Studio 2010&#8243;. Come on, Microsoft! You&#8217;ve got to do better than that. Where is your word-spelling software? Can&#8217;t Microsoft Word tell you that it&#8217;s wrong ?</p>
<p>Screenshot.<br />
<div id="attachment_85" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.sudarpo.net/w/media/2010/04/offical-title.jpg" rel="lightbox[84]"><img src="http://www.sudarpo.net/w/media/2010/04/offical-title-300x79.jpg" alt="" title="offical-title" width="300" height="79" class="size-medium wp-image-85" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Offical on Visual Studio site</p></div></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take a look at the website source code.</p>
<div id="attachment_86" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.sudarpo.net/w/media/2010/04/offical-source-code.jpg" rel="lightbox[84]"><img src="http://www.sudarpo.net/w/media/2010/04/offical-source-code-300x83.jpg" alt="" title="offical-source-code" width="300" height="83" class="size-medium wp-image-86" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Source Code on Offical Site</p></div>
<p>Strangely, Wikipedia acknowledge <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offical">Offical</a>.</p>
<p>References:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/en-us/">Visual Studio 2010</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offical">Wikipedia on Offical -> Official</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sudarpo.net/2010/04/official-or-offical-vs-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
